Introducing Solve Review: A Practical Guide to AI-Powered Patent Review

Patent drafting doesn’t end when the first draft is complete. In many ways, the most important work begins at review.

Jurisdictional compliance, internal style alignment, claim clarity, sufficiency of disclosure, and formal requirements. Each aspect of drafting applications must be carefully checked before filing. Yet a thorough review is time-intensive, difficult to standardize, and hard to scale across teams and large portfolios, especially when up against a tight deadline.

Enter Solve Review

With Solve Review, practitioners can run structured, customizable AI-powered reviews in minutes rather than hours, while maintaining transparency, collaboration, and full control over the output. 

Teams using Solve Review report dramatically, with multi-pass manual reviews that previously took three to four hours completing in a fraction of the time

Key benefits

  • AI-powered patent reviews in minutes
  • Each review is fully customizable
  • Save your reviews as templates, run multiple reviews per application
  • Full transparency of working out and results
  • Resolve issues detected by Solve Review with AI
Introducing Solve Review: A Practical Guide to AI-Powered Patent Review

Why patent review is difficult to scale

High-quality patent review requires legal judgment, technical understanding, and procedural and commercial awareness. But several structural challenges make it difficult to perform consistently and efficiently.

Jurisdictional complexity 

Patent applications must comply with detailed and evolving legal frameworks such as the MPEP in the United States or the EPO Guidelines in Europe. Requirements differ across jurisdictions, making manual review increasingly complex for filings destined for global coverage. Even experienced practitioners must actively cross-reference guidance to ensure compliance.

Inconsistent internal standards 

Firms and in-house teams often maintain internal drafting conventions, including preferred terminology, claim formats, structural templates, and stylistic rules. However, these standards are rarely embedded directly into review systems. As a result, consistency and quality depends heavily on individual reviewers.

Collaboration friction 

Applications frequently move between inventors, in-house counsel, and outside firms. Each stakeholder may apply slightly different review criteria. Aligning expectations can slow down the filing process.

Training and knowledge transfer 

Junior practitioners must learn both formal legal requirements and firm-specific drafting practices. Without structured feedback systems, training can be inconsistent and difficult to scale. This also increases senior attorney time spent on training and reviewing junior work product.

Volume pressure 

Modern patent portfolios can include hundreds or thousands of filings across multiple jurisdictions. Manual review of every application at the same level of rigor is economically challenging.

How Solve Review builds structured review workflows

We built Solve Review to address these challenges and bring structure, repeatability, and intelligence to the patent review process. Here’s how it works in practice:

Step 1: Configure your review

Solve Review allows you to define exactly what you want the AI to assess. Reviews can be customized by technical field, jurisdiction (e.g., US, EP), practice group style, and internal drafting rules. Custom instructions can be saved to your Instructions Library, allowing reuse across future projects.

Step 2: Integrate reviews into templates

Review configurations can be embedded directly into drafting templates. This means that every application created from a template automatically inherits your preferred review configuration. Teams can share templates internally, and collaborate on templates between outside and in house counsel, ensuring that quality control begins at the drafting stage rather than after the fact.

Step 3: Run legal and compliance reviews

Solve Review assesses applications against jurisdictional frameworks including the MPEP and the EPO Guidelines. Rather than requiring practitioners to manually cross-reference these documents, the AI automatically pulls in the relevant legal guidance and cites specific provisions as part of its review.

As guidelines evolve, Solve Intelligence ensures reviews stay current without requiring manual updates to your workflow. This review of the draft also ensures compliance with the chosen template, a powerful way to confirm adherence to client guidelines and firm preferences.

Step 4: Mark up and resolve issues

When issues are identified, Solve can insert comments directly into the document, suggest resolutions in tracked changes, and enable iterative refinement through Chat. Practitioners remain fully in control: reviewing, editing, or rejecting suggestions as needed. 

In practice, teams report resolving the majority of flagged issues in a single review pass, compared to two or three rounds of back-and-forth under manual workflows.

Step 5: Review any document

Solve Review is not limited to documents drafted within Solve. You can upload any patent application, including Word drafts, and run the same structured review workflows against it. This allows firms and in-house teams to standardize review processes regardless of where drafting occurred.

What are the advantages of AI-driven patent review?

Potentially another product image or branded infographic that reflects the below

Standardization at scale

By saving review instructions and embedding them into templates, firms can ensure that consistent standards are applied across offices, teams, and jurisdictions.

Faster turnaround

What previously required multiple manual review passes can now be completed in a fraction of the time, freeing senior practitioners to focus on substantive strategy rather than checklist verification.

Improved transparency

Review criteria are explicit and configurable. Teams can see exactly what is being assessed and refine instructions over time.

Better collaboration

Shared templates and review configurations align expectations between in-house teams and outside counsel, reducing back-and-forth and accelerating filing.

Training support

Structured AI feedback provides junior practitioners with clear, repeatable guidance aligned with firm and jurisdictional standards.

Getting Started With Solve Review

Patent review is too important to shortcut and, until now, performing it rigorously on every application was impractical at portfolio scale. Solve Review changes that. With structured, jurisdiction-aware AI review built directly into the drafting workflow, teams can apply the same rigorous quality standard to every filing, whether they handle fifty applications a year or five hundred. 

To see Solve Review in action, request a demo or contact our team at partnerships@solveintelligence.com.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can Solve Review be used on documents not drafted within the Solve system?

A: Yes, the tool is not limited to documents drafted within Solve; you can upload any patent application, including Word drafts, and run the same structured review workflows against it.

Q: Is the Solve Review module an additional cost?

A: This new feature is included with your existing Solve subscription. It's a complimentary upgrade designed to enhance the value you already receive. 

Q: How does Solve Review stay updated with changes to jurisdictional guidelines (e.g., MPEP, EPO Guidelines)?

A: As legal and procedural guidelines evolve, we update the underlying knowledge base, meaning your reviews automatically reflect the latest requirements without manual updates to your firm's workflow.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the world using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

Page White Farrer Adopts Solve Intelligence for AI-Assisted Patent Drafting

Page White Farrer Adopts Solve Intelligence and Solve's AI Templates

Page White Farrer ("PWF"), a specialist intellectual property firm with a longstanding focus on technology-driven innovation, has selected Solve Intelligence to support patent application drafting following an extensive evaluation of available AI tools. The firm has initially deployed the platform within its technology-focused patent teams, supporting work across sectors such as AI, software, telecommunications, electronics, semiconductors and engineering. 

The firm's objective was not to automate legal judgement or replace attorney expertise, but to accelerate the preparation of high-quality first drafts of patent applications. By combining AI-assisted drafting with custom templates tailored to the firm's preferred drafting approaches, Solve Intelligence helps attorneys move from an initial claim set to a reviewable first draft more efficiently while maintaining consistency and technical accuracy. 

For this partnership, PWF's primary focus was on configuring the platform around the firm's own drafting conventions, client preferences and established best practices, ensuring that the technology supports the way its attorneys already work. 

The Honest Risks of Using AI in Patent Prosecution

AI is changing how patent prosecution gets done, and the upside is real. So are the downsides: hallucinated citations, confidentiality exposure, export-control pitfalls, and prosecution-history estoppel. This is an honest account of the risks of AI patent software in prosecution, and what actually reduces each one.

Key takeaways

  • Anyone presenting AI-assisted content to the USPTO must reasonably review it; relying on the tool's accuracy alone is not enough.
  • Courts have already sanctioned attorneys for AI-hallucinated citations, and similar risk applies to office-action responses and PTAB briefs.
  • The USPTO warns that AI tools on foreign servers can raise export-control, foreign-filing-license, and national-security problems.
  • Grounded citations, exposed reasoning, zero data retention, and attorney oversight are what materially reduce AI risk in patent prosecution.

Maiwald Chooses Solve Intelligence for Selected AI-Supported IP Workflows

Solve Intelligence is proud to share that Maiwald, one of Germany’s largest and most progressive intellectual property firms, works with Solve Intelligence on selected AI-supported workflows in its patent and legal practice groups. Following an evaluation period during which selected functionalities were assessed for approved internal use cases, Maiwald and Solve have formed an enterprise partnership for 2026.

The rollout reflects the same careful approach Maiwald brings to its client work. Solve enables customers in Europe to process data on servers located within Europe and holds recognized information-security certifications. In addition, Solve offers contractual commitments designed to protect confidential professional information in line with applicable statutory confidentiality obligations and professional conduct requirements. Against that background, any use of AI-supported tools took place only within approved governance structures and under applicable professional, contractual, confidentiality and data-protection requirements.

That balance of innovation and professional judgment is characteristic of Maiwald. The firm has spent decades setting a standard for IP work in Europe: rigorous prosecution, a formidable contentious practice, and interdisciplinary teams of patent attorneys and attorneys-at-law working side by side. The firm approached AI the same way, methodically, with a clear sense of where it adds leverage and where an experienced attorney’s judgment remains irreplaceable. 

PTAB Case Studies of AI Disclosure Requirements: Part II

This article is the second of a series of Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) case studies (see Part I), which aims to inform applicants’ approach to satisfying the written description and enablement requirements for patenting artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning technologies.