Written by: 
Justin Doop
, 
October 14, 2024

Feature Update: AI Track Changes

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more integrated into professional workflows, the need for transparency in AI-assisted tasks is increasingly important. One key area where this applies is the patent industry, where accuracy and traceability are critical. To support this, we are introducing a new feature: AI Track Changes, designed to provide clear insights into how AI-generated suggestions and edits are being made to your patent applications, Office action responses, and other patent documents.

Feature Update: AI Track Changes

How AI Track Changes Works

The AI Track Changes feature operates similarly to traditional track changes functionality found in word processing software but tailored specifically for AI-assisted workflows. When using tools like Solve's Patent Drafting Copilot or‍ Solve's Patent Prosecution Copilot, this feature tracks and highlights every change or suggestion made by the AI, allowing users to easily review AI contributions. Whether it’s a simple edit or a more complex completion of a section, all AI-generated actions are documented for complete transparency.

For patent professionals, the ability to clearly identify the AI’s input enhances review processes, ensuring that human users can evaluate and validate the AI’s contributions with confidence. This feature helps professionals manage and maintain control over content accuracy in patent applications, claims, and legal documents.

Enhancing Transparency in AI-Powered Workflows

One of the most important aspects of this update is its focus on transparency. The ability to track AI-generated changes ensures that users can distinguish between their own contributions and those generated by AI. This distinction is critical in industries like patent law, where precision and accountability are paramount.

By offering a clear visual representation of AI-driven modifications, the AI Track Changes feature supports more thorough reviews. Patent professionals can now quickly identify where AI tools have impacted the content and make informed decisions on whether to accept, reject, or further refine those changes. This heightened transparency also ensures that AI tools can be integrated into workflows without introducing ambiguity or uncertainty.

Strengthening Collaboration Between AI and Professionals

The introduction of AI Track Changes reflects a broader trend towards more seamless collaboration between AI and human users. As AI continues to play a larger role in knowledge-based fields, maintaining a clear record of its contributions will be critical to ensuring quality and accountability in outputs.

For patent professionals, this feature allows for more controlled integration of AI into their work. Tools like the Solve's Patent Copilot are designed to enhance productivity and streamline the drafting process, and with AI Track Changes, users can confidently oversee how AI contributes, making sure that all changes align with the required legal and technical standards.

Conclusion

The AI Track Changes feature is a step forward in creating more transparent and accountable AI-driven workflows. By clearly delineating AI-generated edits and suggestions, this feature supports more accurate and reliable document drafting in the patent industry. As AI continues to evolve, features like this will be essential in ensuring that professionals maintain control and clarity in AI-assisted tasks, contributing to more efficient and trustworthy outcomes.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the World using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Request Demo

Related articles

G1/23: Marketed Products Are Prior Art

The Enlarged Board of Appeal issued its decision in G1/23 on July 2, 2025, addressing whether products put on the market before a patent filing date form part of the prior art when their composition or internal structure cannot be reproduced by the skilled person.

‍

Read Now

AI Claim Charting - Patent Prosecution

Patent prosecution has always hinged on precision, speed, and strategic foresight. Yet as Office Actions grow in both volume and complexity—often bundling multiple §§102 (novelty) and 103 (obviousness) rejections grounded in nuanced claim interpretations and an ever-expanding body of prior art—the traditional toolkit of the patent professional faces serious challenges. Manual claim charting, painstaking annotation of cited references, and labor‑intensive crafting of responses under tight deadlines can create bottlenecks, drive up costs, and leave room for human error.

Enter AI-powered claim charting: a suite of advanced natural language processing (NLP), machine‑learning (ML), and knowledge‑representation technologies that is rapidly reinventing each step of the Office Action workflow. By automating the generation of claim charts, surfacing hidden flaws in Examiner rejections, semantically analyzing claim language, and even proposing targeted response strategies, AI tools are transforming how attorneys and agents prosecute patents.

In this post, we’ll explore four core capabilities of AI‑driven claim charting and how they bring both speed and insight to Office Action responses:

  1. Automated analysis of Examiner rejections
  2. Instant flagging of issues and gaps
  3. Holistic assessment of claim language and prior art
  4. AI‑generated response strategies
Read Now

The 5 Best Patent Proofreading Software Solutions for Law Firms (2025)

Key Takeaways

  • Proofreading software has become essential: Manual checks can’t keep pace with growing patent complexity and filing volumes. AI solutions can help prevent costly errors, office actions, and post-grant risks.

  • Most legacy solutions fall short of quality control: Many platforms rely on basic rule-based checks, lack real-time drafting integration, and offer limited jurisdictional support, creating workflow gaps and added manual work.
    ‍
  • Solve Intelligence for AI-assisted patent review: With seamless drafting integration, tracked changes, auto-propagation of edits, and multi-jurisdiction compliance, Solve Intelligence provides unmatched accuracy and efficiency.
Read Now

G 1/24 Decision: EPO Clarifies Claim Interpretation

The Enlarged Board of Appeal issued its decision in case G 1/24 on 18 June 2025, concluding that "The description and drawings shall always be consulted to interpret the claims when assessing the patentability of an invention under Articles 52 to 57 EPC, and not only if the person skilled in the art finds a claim to be unclear or ambiguous when read in isolation."

Read Now
Product
Product