UK Innovation at a Crossroads: Bridging the Global Patent Gap

As global innovation accelerates, the United Kingdom finds itself at a critical juncture. Despite ranking among the top nations in the world for innovation, UK businesses, particularly SMEs, are falling behind in securing international patent protection. A recent report from The Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA) reveals a concerning trend: while global patent filings hit record numbers, British companies are struggling to keep pace, risking their competitive edge in key international markets. In an increasingly interconnected world, securing international patents is not just a strategic advantage - it's a necessity for financial growth, enabling companies to maximise the commercial potential of their innovations on a global scale.

UK Innovation at a Crossroads: Bridging the Global Patent Gap

Bridging the Global Patent Gap

The "Innovation & Patents in the United Kingdom" report from CIPA reveals that the UK, despite its strong performance in innovation, is lagging behind countries like Switzerland, Sweden, and the United States in key patent-related metrics. The UK ranks 4th in the 2023 WIPO Global Innovation Index, but in areas such as patent families per billion GDP and PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) applications, it falls short.

This shortfall in patent protection is not without consequences. Companies that hold patents enjoy 36% higher revenues and pay 53% higher wages than those without registered IP rights. The lack of uptake of patents by British businesses, therefore, means that the UK economy is potentially set to miss out on billions of pounds in value in the coming years.  Moreover, data from the UK Government’s Intellectual Property Office (IPO) has shown that as much as 34% of UK priority patent applications do not go on to produce international patent families, further exacerbating the problem.

The situation presents both a challenge and an opportunity. Whilst filings of US patent applications from UK applicants remains robust, there is an underperformance in patent filings at the European Patent Office (EPO) and in key markets like China, where UK filings lag behind by 20% to 40% compared to France and Germany, even when adjusted for the size of the manufacturing economy. Addressing these gaps could enhance UK companies’ international competitiveness and ability to generate additional revenue.

From a broader perspective, it is clear that this issue is also impacting other countries. Although global international patent (PCT) filings increased in 2022, the data shows that it is not just the UK (-1.7%) that is flagging. International patent filings from advanced economies like the United States (-0.6%) also saw a decline, reflecting a broader trend of underperformance in global patent protection.

The underutilization of international patent protection could be tackled, at least in part, by providing ways of streamlining the process of applying for patent protection in other jurisdictions, saving time for patent attorneys and making the system more cost-effective for applicants.

Here, at Solve Intelligence, we are building the first AI-powered platform to assist with every aspect of the patenting process, including our Patent Copilot™, which helps with patent drafting, and future technology focused on patent filing, patent prosecution, and office action analysis, international patent portfolio strategy and management, and patent infringement analyses. At each stage, our Patent Copilot™ works with the patent professional, and we have designed our products to keep patent professionals in the driving seat, thereby equipping legal professionals, law firms, companies, and inventors with the tools to help develop the full scope of protection for their inventions in an efficient and timely manner. It is hoped that the benefits our products provide could help make patents and the prospect of international patent families more accessible to a wider range of businesses.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the world using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

Page White Farrer Adopts Solve Intelligence for AI-Assisted Patent Drafting

Page White Farrer Adopts Solve Intelligence and Solve's AI Templates

Page White Farrer ("PWF"), a specialist intellectual property firm with a longstanding focus on technology-driven innovation, has selected Solve Intelligence to support patent application drafting following an extensive evaluation of available AI tools. The firm has initially deployed the platform within its technology-focused patent teams, supporting work across sectors such as AI, software, telecommunications, electronics, semiconductors and engineering. 

The firm's objective was not to automate legal judgement or replace attorney expertise, but to accelerate the preparation of high-quality first drafts of patent applications. By combining AI-assisted drafting with custom templates tailored to the firm's preferred drafting approaches, Solve Intelligence helps attorneys move from an initial claim set to a reviewable first draft more efficiently while maintaining consistency and technical accuracy. 

For this partnership, PWF's primary focus was on configuring the platform around the firm's own drafting conventions, client preferences and established best practices, ensuring that the technology supports the way its attorneys already work. 

The Honest Risks of Using AI in Patent Prosecution

AI is changing how patent prosecution gets done, and the upside is real. So are the downsides: hallucinated citations, confidentiality exposure, export-control pitfalls, and prosecution-history estoppel. This is an honest account of the risks of AI patent software in prosecution, and what actually reduces each one.

Key takeaways

  • Anyone presenting AI-assisted content to the USPTO must reasonably review it; relying on the tool's accuracy alone is not enough.
  • Courts have already sanctioned attorneys for AI-hallucinated citations, and similar risk applies to office-action responses and PTAB briefs.
  • The USPTO warns that AI tools on foreign servers can raise export-control, foreign-filing-license, and national-security problems.
  • Grounded citations, exposed reasoning, zero data retention, and attorney oversight are what materially reduce AI risk in patent prosecution.

Maiwald Chooses Solve Intelligence for Selected AI-Supported IP Workflows

Solve Intelligence is proud to share that Maiwald, one of Germany’s largest and most progressive intellectual property firms, works with Solve Intelligence on selected AI-supported workflows in its patent and legal practice groups. Following an evaluation period during which selected functionalities were assessed for approved internal use cases, Maiwald and Solve have formed an enterprise partnership for 2026.

The rollout reflects the same careful approach Maiwald brings to its client work. Solve enables customers in Europe to process data on servers located within Europe and holds recognized information-security certifications. In addition, Solve offers contractual commitments designed to protect confidential professional information in line with applicable statutory confidentiality obligations and professional conduct requirements. Against that background, any use of AI-supported tools took place only within approved governance structures and under applicable professional, contractual, confidentiality and data-protection requirements.

That balance of innovation and professional judgment is characteristic of Maiwald. The firm has spent decades setting a standard for IP work in Europe: rigorous prosecution, a formidable contentious practice, and interdisciplinary teams of patent attorneys and attorneys-at-law working side by side. The firm approached AI the same way, methodically, with a clear sense of where it adds leverage and where an experienced attorney’s judgment remains irreplaceable. 

PTAB Case Studies of AI Disclosure Requirements: Part II

This article is the second of a series of Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) case studies (see Part I), which aims to inform applicants’ approach to satisfying the written description and enablement requirements for patenting artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning technologies.