Drafting for the EPO: How AI Can Make the New EPO–IP Australia PCT Pilot a Success

The EPO and IP Australia are launching a new PCT pilot programme on 1 March 2026 which will allow Australian applicants to designate the EPO as their International Searching and Preliminary Examining Authorities (ISA and IPEA). 

Given the EPO’s rigorous approach to clarity and support requirements, for this pilot programme to succeed, Australian applicants and patent practitioners will have to adapt to draft international applications with EPO-specific requirements in mind.

The launch of this pilot programme will add a new layer of complexity — (and opportunity) for patent practitioners. In a landscape where jurisdictional nuance can shape international search and examination outcomes, AI‑augmented tools such as Solve Intelligence's Patent CopilotTM are becoming increasingly valuable.

Drafting for the EPO: How AI Can Make the New EPO–IP Australia PCT Pilot a Success

Why the EPO–IP Australia PCT pilot matters

This pilot programme will expand options for Australian applicants by giving them access to thorough search reports and detailed written opinions from the EPO early in the international phase. 

The quality of drafting at the PCT stage has always had a direct impact on the usefulness of the international search report and strategic decisions that follow. With the launch of this pilot programme, the importance of high-quality drafting for Australian applicants will be emphasised.

Common challenges

Last autumn, Solve Intelligence wrote about the importance of drafting patents for local jurisdictions even when prosecution strategies are multi-jurisdictional in the article AI for Patents in Every Jurisdiction. The announcement of the EPO-IP Australia pilot programme highlights a slightly different perspective though: the importance of drafting patents for unfamiliar jurisdictions.

All patent practitioners know that drafting conventions that work well in one jurisdiction may create friction in another. This is exacerbated, particularly when applications are searched or examined by offices with strict clarity and support requirements such as the EPO. 

Common challenges include:

  • claim structure requirements 
  • claim dependency practices
  • disclosure standards

These challenges do not disappear during the international phase; rather, they will be amplified when the EPO conducts the international search and issues the written opinion.

How AI can help with patent drafting

AI is becoming an increasingly valuable drafting companion for patent practitioners. Used well, it can accelerate the early stages of application preparation, reduce time spent on repetitive drafting tasks, and help practitioners maintain consistency across claims and the specification.

Just as importantly, AI can act as a quality check. It can be used to surface potential clarity issues, ensure terminology is used consistently, and ensure a robust disclosure. In the context of international filings, this can lead to stronger applications in the international phase and fewer avoidable issues later in prosecution.

For Australian applicants and patent practitioners looking to succeed in the EPO–IP Australia PCT pilot programme, AI-augmented drafting tools could make all the difference.

How Solve’s Patent Copilot supports jurisdiction-specific drafting

Solve Intelligence's Patent Copilot is specifically designed to support jurisdiction-aware drafting from the start. Rather than merely offering generic drafting assistance, it incorporates office-specific conventions into its workflows to help practitioners draft high-quality patent applications tailored to the expectations of different patent offices.

Solve Intelligence's Patent Copilot employs jurisdiction-specific AI algorithms that form “region drafters”. Each region drafter is configured to reflect the requirements, conventions, and best practices of the relevant patent office. 

Practitioners can choose their target jurisdiction from one of two dropdown menus, which will load the appropriate region drafter for their target jurisdiction, and support their drafting for the chosen target jurisdiction. Additionally, users are also given the option to set the user interface and the AI output in their desired language.

Solve Intelligence Patent Drafting Copilot User Interface

For example, with the EPO-focused region drafter loaded, the underlying AI algorithm will ensure that the claims are drafted using the two-part form where necessary and with multiple dependencies, thus reducing the risk of formal objections in the written opinion and improving the support for claim amendments further down the line. Amongst others, Solve's Patent Copilot also has an IP Australia-focused region drafter, making it uniquely positioned to support patent professionals and applicants seeking patent protection in both regions.

Final thoughts

The EPO–IP Australia PCT pilot highlights the strategic value of high‑quality, jurisdiction‑aware PCT drafting. At Solve Intelligence, patent attorneys are working together with engineers to build products that achieve this, that patent professionals across the globe can use in their practice every day.

To learn more, get in touch with us to request a demo.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the World using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

How Solve Intelligence Handles Invention Disclosures and Unstructured Data

If you've been drafting patents for any length of time, you know the real bottleneck is often not the drafting itself. It's the messy inputs that precede it: partial forms, internal review decks, or email threads where the inventive aspects are buried. Getting from that to a coherent starting point for a draft consumes time most practices simply can't afford.

AI can perform much of that translation work: extracting what matters, flagging what's missing, and generating the necessary follow-up questions based on holes and shortcomings. But it must operate inside proper confidentiality controls, and its output requires attorney review before going near a draft. This guide covers how that works in practice in Solve Intelligence's platform .

Key takeaways

  • The disclosure bottleneck is upstream; AI structures messy inputs before the drafting phase begins.
  • AI extracts features, normalises terminology, surfaces gaps, and generates inventor questions, but attorney review is mandatory.
  • The danger is plausible but fabricated detail, not obvious errors. Watch for AI-generated parameters or 'helpful' specifics.
  • Disclosures contain trade secrets and unpublished IP. Use only tools with verified zero-training, zero-retention policies and enterprise-grade security.
  • A sensible pilot, without client approval, uses anonymised or historical disclosures to define 'good' output and track key metrics over limited timeframe.

How Nielsen Is Scaling Patent Operations with AI

Nielsen, a global leader in media audience measurement operating in over 50 countries, manages an industry-leading patent portfolio protecting innovations across a variety of fields, including data science, media measurement technology, and viewer analytics. Operating at the intersection of data science and an ever-changing media landscape requires constant innovation to keep pace. Supporting this innovation velocity requires IP operations that can scale without compromising quality.

Nielsen's in-house team adopted Solve Intelligence as their AI patent platform following a comprehensive evaluation process in Q4 2025. The partnership between Nielsen and Solve Intelligence reflects a shared commitment to precision and enabling practitioners to do their best work more efficiently.

Solve Intelligence Acquires Palito.ai to Unify AI Patent Litigation and Prosecution in One Platform

Solve Intelligence has acquired Palito.ai, a Munich-based startup specialising in AI-powered patent litigation and prior art analysis.

The acquisition deepens Solve’s investment in patent litigation, adding Palito's strengths in validity analysis, case law research, and European patent workflows to Solve’s existing Charts product. The result is a single platform where IP professionals can handle invalidity claim charts, SEP claim charts, freedom-to-operate and clearance analyses, infringement mappings, claim construction analyses, portfolio analyses, and more.

Solve Intelligence is an AI platform for IP professionals, covering patent drafting, prosecution, and litigation. Palito.ai is a Munich-based startup specialising in AI-powered validity analysis and European patent litigation workflows.

At a glance:

  • Solve Intelligence acquires Munich-based Palito.ai
  • Adds validity analysis, prior art research, EPO/UPC/German court workflows
  • New Munich office established
  • Existing Charts users get expanded litigation capabilities

The Shift Has Already Happened: How Legal's Relationship with AI Changed

Two years ago, the dominant argument in the legal industry was whether AI had any place in the profession at all. That debate is over.

Analysts are now calling 2026 the year AI moves from an “interesting tool” to “operational infrastructure”. The speed at which that narrative has changed tells you everything about where the industry is heading.

Key takeaways

  • The legal profession's central question has moved from "can we trust this?" to "how do we integrate this properly?"
  • AI adoption across IP practice has risen from 57% in 2023 to 85% in 2025.
  • Firms are not just trialling AI tools, they are expanding its use across full workflows. Practitioners using Solve Intelligence grew ~560% in 2025 alone.
  • Clearer regulatory guidance has removed one of the most significant psychological barriers to adoption.
  • The profile of firms now adopting AI has changed: these are not early experimenters, but some of the most demanding legal professionals in the world.