Blog

2024 marked a pivotal year for AI adoption in the patent industry, with early adopters reporting significant efficiency gains and improved application quality. As we look ahead to 2025, we're poised to witness an unprecedented surge in AI implementation across patent offices and law firms worldwide. For patent attorneys looking to stay competitive and efficient, understanding these emerging AI tools is no longer optional - it's essential. In this guide, we'll explore the transformative capabilities these technologies can bring to your practice in 2025.

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into the field of intellectual property is transforming the way patent professionals approach their work. One of the most significant advancements in this area is the use of AI tools for drafting patent claims. These claims, the cornerstone of any patent, define the legal scope of an invention’s protection, making their accuracy and clarity critical. With the advent of AI-assisted tools, drafting patent claims is becoming more efficient, precise, and accessible.

‍

This article explores the benefits of using AI to draft patent claims, compares leading AI tools in the market, and highlights important considerations for implementing these tools effectively.

Patent attorneys often face high workloads, tight deadlines, and the pressure to deliver impeccable work. AI-powered tools like Solve Intelligence’s Patent Copilot are revolutionising how patent applications are drafted and prosecuted, offering attorneys significant efficiency gains. Here’s how to make the most of these tools and transform your workflow.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming industries, and the field of intellectual property is no exception. Patent application drafting, traditionally a labor-intensive and detail-oriented process, has witnessed remarkable improvements with AI-powered tools. These technologies are helping patent professionals streamline workflows, enhance precision, and reduce costs. This comprehensive article explores the benefits, use cases, best practices, and tools for drafting patent applications with AI.

Drafting patent applications can be an arduous task. The process often requires several interactions with inventors to extract enough information to start the process, and then begins the exercise of turning that information into a coherent and detailed ~30 page patent specification. This of course takes time (and sometimes more than the proposed/estimated fee for the draft would allow). For this reason, patent drafting is sometimes considered a loss leader by those in private practice. 

‍

From another perspective, the cost of engaging a patent attorney to draft a patent application can be a huge barrier to the uptake of IP, particularly for start-ups and SMEs. Registered IP rights can mean a great deal to these types of applicants, both in terms of carving out a slice of the market and attractiveness to potential investors. Drafting patent applications has thus historically presented a ‘problem’ to both patent attorneys and their would-be clients. 

‍

Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing the game in this regard. Forward-thinking attorneys that have already started utilising AI, and those using Solve Intelligence’s Patent Drafting Copilot have reported considerable improvements in their drafting practices. Such improvements are capable of tackling the drafting problem, providing benefits to both attorneys and their clients or companies alike. We’ve highlighted some of these improvements below.

‍

In today's interconnected world, patent protection across multiple jurisdictions has become increasingly important for businesses and inventors. However, the complexity and cost of patent translations have long been a significant barrier to international patent protection. The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies is changing this landscape, offering new possibilities for faster, more accurate, and more cost-effective patent translations.

Boosting patent drafting efficiency by 40-60%, Scale LLP uses Patent Copilot™ to enhance quality, streamline workflows, and more.

The rapid rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping numerous industries, including the legal profession. For U.S. lawyers, AI tools offer tremendous potential to improve efficiency, accuracy, and speed in completing routine and complex tasks alike. However, alongside the benefits of these powerful tools come ethical considerations. This article explores these ethical challenges in detail, particularly in light of the American Bar Association’s (ABA) recent Formal Opinion 512, which provides guidance for the ethical use of generative AI in legal practice.

As global innovation accelerates, the United Kingdom finds itself at a critical juncture. Despite ranking among the top nations in the world for innovation, UK businesses, particularly SMEs, are falling behind in securing international patent protection. A recent report from The Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA) reveals a concerning trend: while global patent filings hit record numbers, British companies are struggling to keep pace, risking their competitive edge in key international markets. In an increasingly interconnected world, securing international patents is not just a strategic advantage - it's a necessity for financial growth, enabling companies to maximise the commercial potential of their innovations on a global scale.

As the legal industry continues to evolve, staying ahead of the curve with the latest advancements in intellectual property (IP), legal technology, and artificial intelligence (AI) is crucial. Attending top-tier conferences not only helps legal professionals stay updated but also provides networking opportunities, insights into future trends, and the chance to meet industry leaders. Whether you're a seasoned attorney, a tech enthusiast, or someone navigating the complexities of IP law, these events are a must-attend in 2024 and 2025.

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has released updated guidance on patent subject matter eligibility. This update focuses on critical and emerging technologies, particularly artificial intelligence (AI). The new guidance aims to assist USPTO personnel and stakeholders in evaluating the subject matter eligibility of claims in patent applications and patents related to AI technology and inventions. Furthermore, it introduces new examples to help apply the USPTO's subject matter eligibility guidance during patent examination, appeal, and post-grant proceedings. The guidance also addresses stakeholder feedback and recent Federal Circuit decisions.

The integration of generative AI into the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) submission processes is reshaping the landscape of patent and trademark filings. This article provides an overview of all prior guidance from the USPTO on the use of AI and explores the multifaceted role of AI tools in enhancing efficiency, ensuring compliance, and navigating the complex legal and ethical landscapes of patent applications. From drafting patent applications to managing confidentiality and security, legal practitioners must adapt to maintain accuracy, inventorship integrity, and ethical standards in their submissions. Given the numerous practical applications and their benefits, generative AI is becoming an indispensable asset in legal practices, especially in interactions with the USPTO systems.

Stephen Hou, VP & COO of American Patent Agency and long-time customer of Solve Intelligence™, explores the impact of artificial intelligence on patent law, focusing on new regulations for AI patent drafting and AI inventorship across major global patent offices. Stephen describes how jurisdictions in the IP5 (China, Europe, Japan, Korea, and the United States) are updating their guidelines to address the challenges of AI in the patent process, specifically stating that AI cannot be an inventor but highlighting its role in aiding human-driven patentable innovations. This highlights the growing role of artificial intelligence in patent law.

‍

SSRN article: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4843648