In artificial intelligence (AI) development, particularly in domains like generative AI (Gen AI), running structured evaluations - known as evals - is an incredibly useful tool. Evals test models and algorithms in development against real-world tasks to measure performance, detect errors, and improve reliability. In fields such as intellectual property (IP) law, these evals ensure that AI tools meet the high standards of accuracy and compliance required for professional use.

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more integrated into professional workflows, the need for transparency in AI-assisted tasks is increasingly important. One key area where this applies is the patent industry, where accuracy and traceability are critical. To support this, we are introducing a new feature: AI Track Changes, designed to provide clear insights into how AI-generated suggestions and edits are being made to your patent applications, Office action responses, and other patent documents.

In today’s fast-paced innovation landscape, having access to effective patent analysis tools is crucial for businesses looking to stay competitive. These tools help companies analyze existing patents, uncover trends, and identify potential opportunities for innovation. With advancements in AI, AI patent analysis tools have become a game changer, allowing more accurate and efficient research. This article highlights the top patent analysis software for 2024 that can aid in making informed decisions about intellectual property.

The field of intellectual property (IP) is constantly evolving, as businesses and innovators look for more efficient ways to manage and protect their ideas. As IP portfolios grow, the traditional methods of managing patents, trademarks, and copyrights can become increasingly time-consuming, resource-heavy, and prone to error. To keep up with the fast pace of innovation, IP professionals are now turning to artificial intelligence (AI) to streamline processes and deliver better outcomes.

‍

The world of patent prosecution is undergoing a transformative shift, with artificial intelligence (AI) becoming a key player in streamlining and enhancing the prosecution process. Patent professionals—attorneys, agents, and paralegals—can leverage AI to improve efficiency, accuracy, and overall productivity. In this article, we’ll explore the role of AI in patent prosecution, how AI-assisted workflows can boost efficiency, and the challenges and ethical considerations that come with adopting AI solutions in this space.

The legal landscape is changing rapidly with advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), and patent law is no exception. As patent attorneys manage complex processes such as drafting, filing, and litigation, AI tools are emerging as critical resources to boost efficiency, accuracy, and strategic decision-making. AI tools for patent drafting, patent searches, and legal analytics can streamline workflows, helping attorneys focus on the more strategic aspects of their work. In this article, we’ll explore how AI is transforming the patent law industry, the key areas of impact, and the top AI tools patent attorneys are using today.

Boosting patent drafting efficiency by 40-60%, Scale LLP uses Patent Copilot™ to enhance quality, streamline workflows, and more.

Earlier this year, the EPO introduced new guidelines for examination relating to inventions concerning artificial intelligence (See G-II-3.3.1). The last paragraph of these guidelines suggest that applications to AI-related inventions may require specific disclosure surrounding any algorithms used by an AI invention, as well as any training data used to train the AI, where such training data is required to achieve the technical effect of the invention. 

‍

A change in the Guidelines usually reflects a change in thinking or application of the law by the EPO. Indeed, it’s always interesting to see how such changes are actually implemented in practice.  

‍

The recently issued decision T1669/21 of the EPO Board of Appeal provides useful insight into exactly what sorts of specific disclosure may be required to satisfy the sufficiency requirements for patent applications relating to AI inventions. 

‍

A recent T-decision of the Boards of Appeal (T 1741/22) has provided an interesting deviation in how the EPO assesses the requirement of inventive step, from both a previous decision (T 2681/16) and the EPO Guidelines for Examination.

‍

Artificial intelligence (AI) is already having a substantial impact in the practice of Intellectual Property (IP) Law, with platforms such as Solve Intelligence's Patent Copilot assisting attorneys in drafting and prosecuting patent applications. These AI platforms can help patent attorneys realise efficiency gains and help to provide high-quality patents. 

‍

Until earlier this year, the use of AI was largely unregulated across the world. Now, the picture has somewhat changed, with different countries implementing different strategies when it comes to regulating AI, to promote safety but also to remain competitive. Earlier this year, the Artificial Intelligence Act entered into force in the EU, becoming the world's first comprehensive regulation for AI. In this article we have a look at the obligations that the EU AI Act puts on AI technology providers, such as providers of AI patent drafting and prosecution tools.

‍

In recent years, there has been a substantial increase in the filing of patent applications relating to AI-inventions at the EPO. In response to this, the EPO has started and continues to develop a framework for assessing the eligibility and patentability of AI inventions, with the introduction of new guidelines and evolving case law. This article outlines key considerations, common pitfalls, and best practices for drafting patent applications directed to AI inventions at the EPO.

The rapid rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping numerous industries, including the legal profession. For U.S. lawyers, AI tools offer tremendous potential to improve efficiency, accuracy, and speed in completing routine and complex tasks alike. However, alongside the benefits of these powerful tools come ethical considerations. This article explores these ethical challenges in detail, particularly in light of the American Bar Association’s (ABA) recent Formal Opinion 512, which provides guidance for the ethical use of generative AI in legal practice.

As global innovation accelerates, the United Kingdom finds itself at a critical juncture. Despite ranking among the top nations in the world for innovation, UK businesses, particularly SMEs, are falling behind in securing international patent protection. A recent report from The Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA) reveals a concerning trend: while global patent filings hit record numbers, British companies are struggling to keep pace, risking their competitive edge in key international markets. In an increasingly interconnected world, securing international patents is not just a strategic advantage - it's a necessity for financial growth, enabling companies to maximise the commercial potential of their innovations on a global scale.